I have no objections to standard bail conditions. Regarding the size of the bail amount, I would argue that $200,000 should be more than sufficient. As the Court can see from Mr. Galihai's bank statement he is unfortunately already woefully in debt. To the extent he can access bail he will need to beg friends.
In addition, bail is simply to encourage people to show up to court and is not a punitive decision so his prior criminal history isn't really relevant here in terms of severity of the amount. The one thing his history is relevant for is that it shows he has consistently shown up to court in the past which demonstrates little purpose for an extra high bail. It's also worth pointing out his charges aren't violent in nature and there's no safety basis to justify a higher need for bail.
To the extent the concern is that he that might deal in additional illegal items, that is what the bail conditions are intended to prevent and of course the initial charges are currently unproven. I don't think threatening someone who is already over a million in debt with a few hundred thousand more really changes that equation anyway. But what it might do is prevent someone from access to bail simply because they are poor instead of because they're unlikely to show up to court.
