Date Filed: 12 July 2025
Plaintiff Name(s) and Phone Number(s):
1st Plaintiff: Jane Doe (Pseudonym) (###-####)
2nd Plaintiff: Kye Evans (555-3253)
Plaintiff Availability: AU/EU/NA (or Early, Mid, Late NA)
1st Plaintiff: AU
2nd Plaintiff: AU
Attorney Name(s) and Phone Number(s): Abel Gleeson (554-4928)
Attorney Availability: AU
Defendant Name: Blaine County Sheriffs Office
Incident Date: 14 June 2025
Date of Service:12 July 2025
Name of Person Served: William Stout (314)
Reason for Suit:
Summary (Complaint is attached as a separate document)
The 1st Plaintiff sues the Defendant for Constitutional Rights Violation—CS814, for inflicting cruel and unusual punishment in contravention of the 8th amendment by depriving the 1st Plaintiff of food and water while in the Defendant's custody. The 1st Plaintiff further sues the Defendant in Trespass to Goods, and seeks an order by the court enjoining the Defendant from further retaining their property, and mandating its return.
The 2nd Plaintiff sues the Defendant for Constitutional Rights Violation—CS814, for unlawfully seizing the Defendant in contravention of the 4th amendment by arresting the 2nd Plaintiff without cause.
Complaint: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LQv4whh02CJDvYPOFwGIAjgUjOXw5bUv/view?usp=sharing
Joinder of complaints
The 1st Plaintiff and the 2nd Plaintiff's claims being joined together in this claim is warranted. Both claims involve similar questions of fact and law, which ought to be decided in the same proceeding. To sever the claims of the 1st and 2nd Plaintiffs from one another would result in unnecessary expense of judicial resources, prejudice to both parties, and delay.
Evidence:
AR #35844
List Damages:
The 1st Plaintiff claims:
$250,000 in punitive damages against the Defendant;
$50,000 in nominal damages against the Defendant;
Costs reasonably incurred
The granting of an order compelling the BCSO to return the binder seized as pleaded in paragraph 38.
- An equitable remedy is required in this case in lieu of damages because the binder is not capable of being valued due to its personal significance to the 1st Plaintiff
The 2nd Plaintiff claims:
$150,000 in punitive damages against the Defendant
$50,000 in nominal damages against the Defendant
Costs reasonably incurred.
(Tags in accordance with Specific Rule 1)
@BCSO Legal @PENTA @Tessa Walker | L. Gray-Quinn @Gwen Pepper
