A. Celestine | 187 R. O'Cop
Honourables if the defence would like to call them, they can call them. and stating something is hearsay after given a statement, on which they were the doctor who operated, they were the doctor who received the plaintiff, there is no second hand information, it would all be first hand, which would be on the grounds of truthful, if we required every statement to be monitored by an officer of oaths, well the clerks would need to be at every crime scene?
With regards to the witnesses and the motions seen, The plaintiff requests time to process what has been said... because we are concerned that supernatural beliefs are coming in to question here, and it is not something everyone has to believe, and we certainly don't.